Postoperative Prescribing Practices Following Gynecologic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Opioids prescribed for postoperative pain have exceeded patient need in the United States, playing a significant role in the opioid epidemic. In the preintervention phase of this project (September 2018 - March 2019), a chart review and patient survey revealed that patients were prescribed double the number of opioids they consumed following gynecologic surgery. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether an educational intervention recommending opiate prescriptions based on postoperative opioid use decreases gynecologic surgeons' opiate prescriptions. METHODS: An educational intervention implemented in January 2021 communicated the discrepancy between patient need and medications prescribed and made prescribing recommendations for common gynecologic procedures. A postintervention (February 2021 - April 2021) retrospective chart review ascertained postoperative opioid prescribing practices. Residents were surveyed about their prescribing practices in June 2021. Descriptive statistics compared each phase. RESULTS: For laparoscopic hysterectomy, the median morphine milligram equivalent (MME) was 150 (IQR 112.5-166.9) for preintervention and 150 (IQR 112.5-150) postintervention. For vaginal hysterectomy, median MME declined from 150 (IQR 112.5-225) to 112.5 (IQR 112.5-150). For laparoscopic surgery without hysterectomy, the median MME was 75 for both preintervention (IQR 75-120) and postintervention (IQR 60-80). For vaginal surgery without hysterectomy median MME went from 75 (IQR 75-142.5) to 54 (IQR 22.5-112.5). Median MME for hysteroscopy and dilation and curettage was 0 for both phases. When surveyed, residents reported prescribing lower amounts than actual prescribing practices. CONCLUSIONS: Despite education informing gynecologic surgeons that their opioid prescribing exceeded patient need, prescribing practices did not change. The difference between actual and resident-reported prescribing practices warrants further investigation.

Professional Address during Obstetrics and Gynecology Grand Rounds Introductions: Setting the Stage, Setting the Standard.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess gender dynamics during Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) Grand Rounds. DESIGN: This was an observational cohort study of Ob/Gyn Grand Rounds introductions at a large academic center. Ob/Gyn Grand Rounds introductions from December 2016 to February 2020 were included. Audio and video components of introductions for those with doctorate degrees were reviewed. Each named reference to the presenter and use of descriptors were collected. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Student's t-test for continuous variables. SETTING: This study was completed at the University of Wisconsin in the Department of Ob/Gyn PARTICIPANTS: Ob/Gyn Grand Rounds introducers who had complete audio and video components of introductions for those with doctorate degrees. RESULTS: Sixty-four Grand Rounds introductions were reviewed; 57 met inclusion criteria. The majority of introducers and presenters were women. Consistent use of "doctor" was similar by men and women introducers (50% vs. 29%, p = 0.427). Assistant professors were more likely to maintain professional address during introductions, compared to associate or full professors (86% vs. 0% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). Trainees were less likely than faculty to be addressed professionally at any time during introductions (42% vs. 81%, p = 0.017). Descriptors were used for men and women presenters, though men received more female-gendered descriptors than women (5 vs. 1, p = 0.011). Women introducers used productivity descriptors less often than men introducers (8 [15.1%] vs. 5 [55.6%] (p = 0.015)). CONCLUSIONS: Use of professional address was associated with academic rank, but not gender. Men endorsed and received more descriptors emphasizing accomplishments, highlighting qualifications as an expert. Given the professional environment, all Grand Rounds presenters should be introduced using professional titles.

Reasons Behind Preferences for Community-Based Continence Promotion.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to understand the potential reach of continence promotion intervention formats among incontinent women. METHODS: The Survey of the Health of Wisconsin conducts household interviews on a population-based sample. In 2016, 399 adult women were asked about incontinence and likelihood of participation in continence promotion via 3 formats: single lecture, interactive 3-session workshop, or online. Descriptive analyses compared women likely versus unlikely to participate in continence promotion. To understand format preferences, modified grounded theory was used to conduct and analyze telephone interviews. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven (76%) of 246 incontinent women reported being likely to attend continence promotion: 111 (45%) for a single lecture, 43 (17%) for an interactive 3-session workshop, and 156 (64%) for an online program. Obesity, older age, nonwhite race, prior health program participation, and Internet use for health information were associated with reported continence promotion participation. Cited advantages of a single lecture included convenience and ability to ask questions. A workshop offered accountability, hands-on learning, and opportunity to learn from others; online format offered privacy, convenience, and self-directed learning. CONCLUSIONS: Most incontinent women are willing to participate in continence promotion, especially online.